Visit the new HalogenGuides.com.  Expert guides on luxury travel.

Halogen Guides : Jets

Halogen Guides : Jets

3 Reasons Why Supersonic Business Jets Are the Future of Private Aviation (But Why You Maybe Shouldn't Hold Your Breath)


Aerion supersonic business jet The Concorde was supposed to usher in a new era of widespread supersonic commercial flight. Millions of travelers would zip around the world at faster than the speed of sound, or so it was hoped. Instead, due to both high costs and widespread public dismay over sonic booms, the Concorde subsisted only for a few transatlantic routes run by Air France and British Airways. Not long after a fateful Concorde crash outside of Paris in July of 2000 service was suspended, and supersonic transport aviation was dead.

In the face of rising fuel costs and razor thin margins, commercial aviation has responded with larger planes designed to carry boatloads of passengers, like the Airbus A380, or with models geared towards point to point efficiency, like Boeing’s 787. Pure speed has fallen by the wayside. Now it seems the world of private aviation may be picking up where the Concorde left off, and where, for now at least, the airlines refuse to go again.

In a previous article Halogen Guides declared supersonic business jets to be one of the four top private jet trends of the future. Here are the top reasons why billionaires could be flying them very soon, and a few reasons why maybe we shouldn’t get our hopes up just yet.

The Demand is there

While the private jet travel industry has shown itself to be not entirely impervious to the current economic slowdown, demand for new jets remains robust. Gulfstream’s forthcoming G-650 (due to arrive in 2012) has already lined up a host of buyers willing to shell out $58.5 million for the fastest business jet in the skies. For the world’s busiest business executives, cramming meetings far and wide from Jakarta to Seoul to London and back, the efficiencies offered by supersonic travel are enough to justify the expense. For the billionaire boys club, meanwhile, a supersonic private jet will likely be irresistible as the ultimate toy.

Projects are in the works

At least three major supersonic business jets are currently under development. Reno, Nevada-based Aerion Corporation has gathered some 40 down payments of $250,000 from customers looking to get a top place in line for its 8 passenger model which the company say will have a top speed of Mach 1.6 and a range of over 4,600 miles. With a target price of $80 million, those orders are worth over $3 billion, more than enough to cover the estimated $1.2 billion development costs

The Quiet Supersonic Transport (QSST), being developed by Lockheed’s legendary Skunkworks division— the guys who brought you the SR-71 Blackbird as well as stealth technology— under contract from Supersonic Aerospace International, is slated to have a top speed of Mach 1.8 and features an innovative gull-wing design.

An intriguing third player has emerged with the news that business jet stalwarts, Cessna, has entered the ring with plans for a design of its own. Little is known about Cessna’s plans at the moment, but the fact that such a reputable private aviation brand is developing a supersonic jet ought to lend some credence to the movement.

Technology to reduce sonic booms is advancing

The Concorde was relegated to transatlantic flights by the FAA because of the disturbing noise of sonic booms, severely limiting the prospects for commercial supersonic flight. In order for faster than sound business jets to take off, engineers will need to develop a work around.

The QSST is said to feature technology which can mitigate the effects of a sonic boom. The QSST design features an airframe whose subtle curves break up the wave of pressure which generates a sonic boom as a plane passes the speed of sound. The net effect is that instead of creating two echoing booms thundering across the land, the plane passes through a series of mini-booms imperceptible on the ground.

The Aerion SBJ features a less radical design. Still Aerion claims its jet’s wing and airframe design softens sonic booms enough so that they are inaudible on the ground when the plane flies below Mach 1.2. In the United States, where the law prevents planes from traveling faster than Mach 1 no matter how small a boom they make, the plane will be able to cruise comfortably just below the speed of sound.

But…

We’ve seen this before…

Back in the early nineties famed Russian jet manufacturer Sukhoi partnered with Gulfstream in an effort to develop a supersonic business jet. The fruit of that joint venture, the Sukhoi-Gulfstream 21 had tantalizing specs— including a top speed of Mach 2.1 and a service ceiling of 63,900 ft— but flagging demand and high R&D costs tabled the project before it ever left design boards.

While the current supersonic business jet projects appear well-capitalized, and have had no trouble lining up interested customers, cost over-runs are the expectation in the aviation business, particularly in developing such radical new planes.

Aerion, the most well publicized project, in spite of solid financial backing, has still not found a jet frame manufacturer willing to take on the project. Could manufacturers be leery?

High Fuel Costs, Environmental Concerns Linger

With fuel costs spiraling ever and ever upward, will supersonic jets with super-duper fuel burns to match, make much sense? The high operating cost of the Concorde meant the plane almost never was able to turn a profit for Air France or BA, and while the new designs promise to utilize lighter materials, those huge turbofans suck up huge amounts of jet-fuel. In addition to the impact of sonic booms, there is also the concern that supersonic aircraft will pollute more than their slower brethren. There is evidence to suggest that planes flying at the high altitude preferred for supersonic travel cause more direct damage to the ozone layer, and the higher burn rate naturally means more emissions in general. With increased public perception of global warming, one wonders if regulators might step in.

So will billionaire moguls really be cruising from New York to Tokyo in nine hours in the near future? We think so, but we’d be a little more sure when we see some of these planes off the drawing board.

13 Comments

Len Hobbs said:

Super sonic air travel, while still technologically possible...probably will not come back again...in our lifetime. Fuel cost is certainly a constraint...but not nearly as ornerous as the maintenance. Commercial aircraft maintenance is the 800 pound gorilla...NOBODY wants to factor into the current financial conundrum facing all airlines and operators. There are less than a handfull of people in this entire industry who understand that the cost, inefficiency and lost revenue days rooted in maintenance is a cancer which has afflicted the industry for the past forty years...and is getting, progressively, worse. Airline CEO's continue to wallow in denial and abject ignorance of how poorly their companies are performing. Lots of money will get a new aircraft designed and into operation...the same is not true for maintaining them. The maintenance infrastructure to support a high altitude, high speed airplane does not exist. Until it does, 560 mph looks like the upper limit.

Brian Provost said:

Len Hobbs...congratulations on posting the first blog comment in the history of the Internets that provided value to readers.

Michael said:

If the price is right they will come. Some people will be willing to pay and if so some manufacturers will make the plane. Busjets are for fat cats who dont care about the money. It's not like charter or RPT where casts are a real issue. For me the issues are what mix of range and performance wil they lob on.

Eric said:

Mr. Hobbs raises some valid concerns, and fuel is always the cheapest thing that will ever go into the plane. However, reliability is on the rise and I believe given the level of utilization this type of aircraft will probably see the actual maintenance costs should be somewhat livable. (Until you compare fixed costs against utilization!) The cost of maintenance on the commercial side is most likely caused by older aircraft and the fact that aircraft operating under commercial rules (FAA regulations 121 and 135) have more requirements for scheduled maintenance then a privately operated aircraft. But! The increased temperatures associated with supersonic flight for both the airframe and the engines will probably make for some interestingly unique inspection requirements.

Ryan Biggs said:

I agree with Michael. Commercial SSTs, no. But high end business aircraft rarely make any sense from a strictly financial perspective (CEOs may try to argue otherwise). Witness the booming market in so called "VVIP airplanes": aircraft such as 777s, 747s, and A380s converted into toys for the ultra rich. So even if these things cost five times as much to operate as a typical subsonic business jet of similar size, I think there may be a market.

Eric said:

Len Hobbs Says: Super sonic air travel, while still technologically possible...probably will not come back again...in our lifetime. Fuel cost is certainly a constraint...but not nearly as ornerous as the maintenance. I agree if the aircraft is predicated on older technology. But, after optimising the compressor for the higher temps and such items as fixed geometry inlet, going supersonic with a small airframe is well within the realm of possibility. And it would probably run no more to operate then an older Falcon 10 or 20 does today. (Not cheap but still affordable)

Richard R. Tracy said:

Mr. Rosekrans: Thanks for putting the spotlight on the supersonic segment. As a principal of Aerion, I would like to provide some further background. Past efforts from Sukhoi and others did not come to fruition due to conventional delta wing designs and lack of a suitable engine. As you suggest, the delta wing planform of the Concorde had a lot to do with its high fuel consumption and operating cost. The Aerion supersonic jet has a supersonic natural laminar flow wing, which produces far less drag and therefore can cruise efficiently both subsonically and supersonically. It is able to utilize an existing engine, the Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219. Other proposed designs lack a viable engine. While the Aerion jet’s engines will certainly burn more fuel when flying supersonically, the aircraft will be flying about twice as fast as conventional aircraft. Hourly operating cost will be higher, but cost per nautical mile is actually about the same as today’s large jets from Gulfstream and Bombardier. The environmental impact will be no different than today’s aircraft. The Aerion jet will cruise at or below 51,000 feet, well below the ozone layer and at altitudes commonly used by other jets today. The -219 is a modernized version of an existing engine and will have lower exhaust emissions than models already in use. You mentioned the busy executive jetting from Jakarta to London. Their time truly is at a premium. They will most certainly be flying in some sort of private jet, and we propose that they fly a faster one rather than just a bigger one. When you develop technology as disruptive to the norm as a supersonic airplane, gaining industry support is not a slam dunk. But our discussions with potential manufacturing partners are promising, and from regulatory, technical and market standpoints, Aerion is the most likely contender to put a supersonic jet in the air. Sincerely, Richard Tracy, PhD Chief Technology Officer Aerion Corporation

Don Shultz said:

The very first week that I began my career as a model maker at the Boeing Wind tunnel....How fortunate to be assigned to work with one of the world's most gifted, passionate and creative supersonic team of aerodynamic engineering and model making staff on planet earth. I joined the team just about the time they were dismantling the beautiful full scale mock up of a brand new Boeing Supersonic transport, just in time to take part in the last ditch efforts to make this dream a reality. It was quite a heart-wrenching time for so many of this team of dedicated and driven souls....to see their years of hard work and reseach being packed away in crates, boxes and stored away in the bowels of the wind tunnel's basement phantom works vaults. I retired in 2004 with still having a glimer of hope that some time in the future...we just might see a new beginning and another giant leap forward that supersonic travel once again...just might become the new reality. However,SADLY, the GEORGE W. BUSH daze-days and the BIG TEXAS OIL barons and the Gulf war has all but dashed my own personal dreams of ever again seeing a new "SURGE" in supersonic business and commerical travel...AT LEAST IN MY LIFETIME.

Gil said:

This is not a very well known fact, but the Citation X has supersonic capability......during flight testing using the non-derated RR AE3007 engines, it had achieved Mach 1 plus airspeed.

JIM R. said:

Hey, Jet builder's and manufacturer's, let's stop fooling around with these silly new designs that never get into the air.....here's a wonderful suggestion....Lets take the basic USAF B-1 Bomber, or it's essential design, and convert it into a supersonic corporate transport jet. it carries a heavy bomb load, so it can carry a good corporate passenger load, when converted....It is already a proven design, with good range and durability....pressurization of the passenger cabin can be plumbed in, if not there... Perhaps it could even be re-engined for greater efficiency. The wing design lends itself to high subsonic operations over areas that cannot be overflown in the supersonic mode...But , over areas, and oceans that permit supersonic flight, merely a fast sweepback of the wings, and a quick throttle-up will immediately produce a supersonic pace. I believe we should study this as the rudimentary design already available to build a similar s/s corporate cousin, and take the next step into the corporate airplane of the future...We can probably do this within a couple of years, or less...

Josh said:

Supersonic jets are a brilliant idea. You talk about how the jets burn massive amounts of fuel and cause loud sonic booms. But looking back, we're a genius species. From the model t to the luxury vehicles of today, we are constantly changing and bettering designs. So the technology isn't here yet. It will come though, and within our lifetime. Hell we might not be using fossil fuels in 50 years. Are planes may all run on hydrogen or cold fusion, both superior fuel sources.

jhonos said:

i belive that no matter what boom it makes we should be able to travel at the speed of sound.if it is safe.Because im not going on no super jet that goes higher than the speed of sound and has had reported crashes or engine failures.they should test this plane before realeasing it to the public for saftey even use robots to test the dammed thing.i just want a plane to get me where i want to go quick and is safe.

Nick Holt said:

Mr. Hobbs certainly talks a good talk - as I, and two of my business associates, recently discovered. Please contact me, Mr. Hobbs. We have some unfinished business to conduct.

Post Your Own Comment

(Required)

(Required)

(required)


Home / Decision Guides / Directory / Private Jet Finder / Reviews / News